Archive for the ‘Criminal Issues’


Lethal Injections Upheld in Missouri

In the first review by a federal appeals court of a full-scale challenge to a state’s lethal-injection law, a court in St. Louis has found Missouri’s procedure constitutional, paving the way for the resumption of executions in the state.

The ruling becomes the guiding legal principle within the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, which includes two other states using lethal injection — Arkansas and South Dakota.

Although the decision has no binding effect in other federal circuits, the decision could be cited in litigation in other parts of the country, including California. In San Jose, U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel ruled in December that California’s lethal-injection procedure, as administered, did not pass constitutional muster. The state revised its procedure, which Fogel is reviewing.

The 3-0 ruling by the 8th Circuit reversed a decision last year by a federal judge in Kansas City who said the state’s execution methods created an unnecessary risk that an inmate could be subjected to "unconstitutional pain and suffering when the lethal injection drugs are administered."

The 8th Circuit panel said it found "no wanton infliction of cruel and unusual punishment."

Lohan DUI Arrest Gives Hollywood a Headache

Johnny Grant, the longtime Hollywood showman and Tinseltown’s unofficial mayor, has seen a lot of star antics over the decades.

But from his penthouse apartment atop the trendy Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel, Grant, 84, said he’s not happy about what he’s seeing today — especially amid investigations focusing on underage starlets partying at Hollywood hot spots.

So went the finger-pointing on Hollywood Boulevard and the Sunset Strip as the state Alcoholic Beverage Control Board was poised to investigate the case of actress Lindsay Lohan, who was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence after what tabloids and paparazzi said was a night of partying.

ABC spokesman John Carr said that after the Beverly Hills Police Department provides evidence that alcohol was in Lohan’s system, the agency would try to determine whether the 20-year-old actress was illegally served liquor. Police have only said that Lohan’s blood-alcohol level was over the .08 legal limit after her arrest early Saturday.

ABC is seeking a 15-day closure of the club Mood on Hollywood Boulevard after photos last year showed several underage stars, including Lohan and singer Jesse McCartney, partying there.

An attorney for Mood said the bar has become a scapegoat and that more focus should be given to how underage patrons get fake identifications and why their parents don’t better monitor their behavior.

"Put the blame where blame should be, with the minor," said attorney Stephen Solomon, adding the club diligently checks the IDs of all young-looking patrons. "That’s the person you should worry about going after."

Officials in West Hollywood said they hope the Lohan case serves as a cautionary tale for bars.

Mayor Pro-Tem Jeff Prang said businesses roll the dice if they allow underage celebrities to drink in their establishments.

Two Killed at Illegal Drag Race

Illegal drag racing is a culture not restricted to California, but it again took another bloody turn early Sunday in Lancaster, California when a passing driver veered into a crowd of spectators, leaving two men dead and three men hospitalized. Some onlookers then jumped into their cars, chased down the driver and held him for deputies, authorities said.

The driver was booked on suspicion of felony hit and run.

More than 150 people were gathered about 1 a.m. on a dark stretch of desert highway when a westbound Chevy truck, not involved in the race, plowed into the crowd, investigators said. The driver then sped away and was pursued for five miles before he was stopped. The spectators held him until deputies arrived.

Illegal street racing is a major problem across the land, especially now that the summer months are with us.  Enthusiasts often communicatie via text messages and gather in the early morning along mostly deserted highways to watch drivers compete at speeds in excess of 100 mph. Even spectators, can be cited under codes specifically outlawing drag racing.

Such races have long been part of U.S. — and especially Southern California — underground culture. It was celebrated as early as the 1950s in the James Dean movie "Rebel Without a Cause" and subsequently in films such as "Two-Lane Blacktop," "American Graffiti" and "The Fast and the Furious." The last film is credited as the first cinematic look into the illegal sport-compact racing community.

The phenomenon, seen in both rural and urban areas, has claimed many casualties.

As a result, a number of cities across the nation have imposed penalties on street racers and the spectators who cheer them on.

3 Doctors Held in Health Insurance Scam

Likened to "body snatchers" by Southern California Orange County’s top prosecutor, three doctors were arrested Wednesday for their alleged roles in an elaborate insurance fraud scheme in which hundreds of patients across the U.S. were recruited to undergo unnecessary procedures in exchange for money or low-cost cosmetic surgeries.

The arrests bring to 17 the number of people named in the "rent-a-patient" scam allegedly operated out of Unity Outpatient Surgery Center in Buena Park.

Michael C. Chan, a Cerritos, California obstetrician, William W. Hampton, a Seal Beach, California surgeon, and Mario Z. Rosenberg, a Beverly Hills gastroenterologist on staff at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, are accused of performing more than 1,000 unneeded procedures on 940 patients, then billing insurance companies an estimated $30 million for the work.

Each of the doctors is facing 47 felony counts, including conspiracy and insurance fraud, and could receive nearly 50 years in prison if convicted. They were ordered held on bail after their arrests and could be arraigned as early
The California Medical Board is pursuing suspension of their licenses.

Los Angeles attorney Peter Morris, who represents Rosenberg, ardently denied the charges, calling them "false" and defending his client as "one of the most highly respected gastroenterologists in the country."

According to the district attorney’s office, five Unity administrators and nine alleged recruiters, also known as "cappers," had already been arrested since the case began unfolding about four years ago. One of the cappers has been convicted and sentenced to 12 years in prison. Two other cappers and one administrator have pleaded guilty.

In the scheme, authorities said, cappers would be paid commissions to recruit patients from around the country to have unneeded colonoscopies or other procedures, including what is usually a last-resort surgery for sweaty-palms disease. This operation involves collapsing a lung and clipping a nerve. In exchange, prosecutors said, the patients were rewarded with cash, vacations and cosmetic surgery, including tummy tucks and face-lifts.

Between July 2002 and April 2003, prosecutors said, more than 2,000 patients from more than 30 states were solicited to participate in the Unity scheme, resulting in $90 million in fraudulent claims billed to more than a dozen insurance companies. Those companies ultimately paid Unity $17 million of those claims, prosecutors said.

Border Case Puts U.S. Attorney on Defensive

 Internet cartoons show him with horns and the word "TRAITOR" branded on his forehead. Conservative talk radio derides him as "Johnny Satan." At least two Republican congressmen, normally staunch defenders of the Bush administration, have castigated him on the House floor.

If the White House and Justice Department had added Johnny Sutton to the list of federal prosecutors to be fired, his ouster probably would not have raised an eyebrow among Democrats, and it would have pleased much of the president’s conservative base.

Sutton is the U.S. attorney in west Texas. Based in San Antonio, his border district reaches to El Paso. For five years he has been the top federal lawman in one of the nation’s busiest regions, a job he long dreamed of having. It also is one he secured with deep ties to President Bush and Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales, going back to their time in state government in Austin.

The uproar is over his prosecution of two U.S. Border Patrol agents for the February 2005 shooting of a fleeing Mexican drug smuggler near El Paso, a shooting the agents tried to cover up. Last year, Sutton’s office won convictions against Agents Ignacio "Nacho" Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean.

Each was a line officer in what many people consider a hopeless chore: trying to hold back a deluge of illegal immigrants from Mexico. Each is a father of three. And each was sentenced to more than a decade in prison: Ramos to 11 years, Compean to 12.

The agents were sentenced in October, just as the White House and Justice Department were preparing plans to fire eight other federal prosecutors, and the parallel events have left normally strong Bush supporters disappointed that Sutton was not terminated too.

A 42-Year Rush to Justice

Last  Week’s murder indictment of a former Alabama state trooper for the 1965 shooting of a young black voting-rights demonstrator is one more Deep South prosecution of a long-forgotten white defendant who ended up on the wrong side of the civil rights revolution.

It’s one of many. In recent years, prosecutors have won convictions in connection with, among others, the 1963 church bombing in Birmingham, Ala., and the killings of three civil rights workers near Philadelphia, Miss., in 1964. In many of these cases, credible eyewitness testimony — from survivors, co-conspirators and even close relatives — has proved crucial in winning solid convictions in connection with decades-old race crimes.

But this indictment may be different. At first glance, the charges filed against 73-year-old James Bonard Fowler seem straightforward. Fowler was one of about 50 Alabama troopers dispatched to the small Perry County town of Marion on Feb. 18, 1965, to break up a nonviolent demonstration that was part of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s nascent voting-rights campaign, centered in nearby Selma. One of King’s aides had been jailed in Marion earlier that day, and the after-dark protest march in the town square was blocked by the lawmen, who then set upon the 400 marchers with nightsticks. Onlooking journalists were attacked by local whites, and as some of the marchers fled the square, troopers pursued them.

Jimmie Lee Jackson, 26, ran into nearby Mack’s Cafe along with his mother, Viola. Shortly after, four troopers entered. Written statements given later by three troopers say that bottles were thrown at them from the cafe and that more bottles met them when they burst in. Fowler’s declaration and that of another still-living former trooper, Robert C. Andrews, describe a tussle over a bottle between a black woman — probably the late Viola Jackson — and a third trooper, who then was assaulted by two black men.

Fowler grabbed one of those men, Jimmie Lee Jackson, whom he says struck him with a bottle several times while simultaneously attempting to remove his gun from its holster. Both men lost their balance, Fowler wrote, and "on the next blow which struck my hand the gun fired."

But that’s where the story starts to get slightly murkier. Andrews’ statement is different from Fowler’s account. He describes seeing Fowler shove Jackson aside and says that when Jackson "again advanced toward Corporal Fowler, he drew his revolver and fired." When Fowler himself recalled the incident in his first-ever public interview in 2005 with the Anniston Star, he told Editor John Fleming that during the tussle "my hand was on the trigger then and I pulled the trigger." He added that "I don’t remember how many times I pulled the trigger, but I think I just pulled it once, but I might have pulled it three times."

In recent comments to reporters, after it became clear that he might indeed face charges, Fowler reverted to his 1965 account, saying, "we both had our hands on my gun, and the forced motion caused the gun to fire."

Jackson suffered two gunshot wounds to the stomach and died eight days later from a massive infection. A hospital administrator told the New York Times on the day Jackson died that "there were powder burns on Mr. Jackson’s stomach," indicating he had been shot at close range. The Times also reported that before his death, Jackson gave a statement to a lawyer, in the presence of two FBI agents — a statement that has never been made public and whose current whereabouts or existence is unknown.

Like other, similar cases, no serious investigation of the shooting occurred at the time, and even the shooter’s full identity remained shrouded until Fowler spoke expansively to Fleming in early 2005. In that interview, Fowler revealed that a year later, in May 1966, he shot another black man, a prisoner who took a "billy club and hit me across the head right here. I pulled my gun and shot him. I shot him three times…. I killed him." Fowler faced no charges for that shooting either.

Fowler was discharged from the state police in 1968 after physically assaulting a superior officer. He joined the military, winning two Silver Stars in Vietnam, before returning to Alabama.

After Fleming’s story was published in March 2005, the Alabama Legislative Black Caucus called for Fowler’s prosecution. Dist. Atty. Michael Jackson (no relation to Jimmie Lee), who had been elected in 2004 as the first black prosecutor for Perry and four other Selma-area counties, also took an interest in the case, and, in late April, he announced his upcoming grand jury presentation to an audience at Harvard University. "This case is going to attract a lot of attention," he accurately proclaimed.

Although it’s true that there are elements of the story that certainly don’t look good for Fowler — such as the fact that he killed another black man a year later — it’s not so clear that the case itself has been terribly well thought out or that the evidence amounts to all that much.

The murder indictment Jackson obtained on Wednesday came from a grand jury that heard a sum total of only two hours of testimony, none of which came from anyone who actually saw the shooting, according to the Associated Press and other reports. Instead, several witnesses described the troopers’ earlier assault on the column of marchers, which seems hardly germane. Another witness, Vera Jenkins Booker, a former hospital nurse, recalled her memories from 42 years ago of what Jimmie Lee Jackson said about the shooting before he died. Under Alabama law, such "deathbed declarations" can be used at trial, and the District Attorney sees this testimony as the key to his case.

But is this a credible record on which to indict someone for murder, or is it instead an indicator of headline-hunting excess, an occupational weakness of popularly elected prosecutors?

Padilla Case Has Changed a Lot In 5 Years

When federal prosecutors begin to present evidence Monday against terrorism suspect Jose Padilla, their case is expected to rest heavily on a single document: his alleged application to become an Islamic warrior.

Prosecutors plan to call a covert CIA operative to testify in disguise about the document’s provenance and chain of possession, and will go on to introduce more than half of the 200-plus transcripts from wiretapped conversations among the defendants.

Nowhere in the indictment is there mention of the sensational charges leveled against Padilla when he was arrested at O’Hare International Airport in May 2002. Then-Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft said U.S. agents had thwarted a plot between Padilla, who is a U.S. citizen, and top Al Qaeda figures to detonate a radioactive "dirty bomb" or blow up apartment buildings in U.S. cities.

The case against Padilla, now 36, has come a long way since then, and illustrates how the administration’s policies of detaining suspects in the war on terrorism can backfire.

The allegations that Padilla was part of a dirty-bomb plot were dropped in November 2005, when the Pentagon transferred him out of a military brig in Charleston, S.C.

He had been held at the brig for 3 1/2 years as an "enemy combatant" with status more like the detainees at Guantanamo than a U.S. citizen incarcerated for the charges he would eventually face in federal court. Much of the time he was without human contact, daylight, any timepiece or a mirror. He was subjected to "stress positions" and extremes of heat, noise and light. And interrogations without an attorney present, the government has said, elicited information the Justice Department included in a widely publicized June 2004 report on Padilla’s alleged contacts with Al Qaeda.

The dossier on the dirty-bomb allegations was augmented by testimony that senior Al Qaeda operative Abu Zubaydah gave while in a secret CIA prison overseas, according to court papers filed in November. Zubaydah is now being held as a "high-value detainee" at the U.S. military detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

But none of that will be admissible in his conspiracy and material-support trial. In pretrial rulings on defense claims that the government mistreated Padilla, U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke effectively severed the conspiracy case from the dirty-bomb allegations.

Acquitted of Murder, Sargent Now Faces Army Justice

Timothy B. Hennis, a quiet father and grandfather retired from the Army after service in the first Gulf War and Somalia, has long been portrayed as an innocent victim of a biased, incompetent criminal justice system.

Hennis was tried twice for a grisly triple murder of a military family, and acquitted after 2 1/2 years on death row. No. 39 on the Death Penalty Information Center’s "Innocence List," the 49-year-old master sergeant has made public appearances with other freed inmates to demonstrate just how wrong the justice system can be. A book and a television movie chronicled his fight to prove his innocence.

Now the Army has called him back from retirement to face a possible court-martial and death sentence for the same crime for which he has twice been tried: raping and stabbing to death a woman and slicing the throats of her two little girls on a drizzly night in 1985 on Summerhill Road in Fayetteville, N.C. New laboratory evidence was strong enough for detectives to persuade the military to take on a case barred by double-jeopardy rules from returning to state court.

The results of tests on crime scene samples — stored for two decades — are expected to be unveiled this week in a military hearing at Ft. Bragg, N.C., where Hennis was recalled to duty Oct. 30 from his modest neighborhood in this lake-studded city near Puget Sound. The Army can recall a retired soldier to charge him with a crime anytime before the legal deadline for prosecution; murder has no statute of limitations.

A knowledgeable source said a DNA match came from semen; lawyers in the case have refused to confirm that.

A spokesman at Ft. Bragg said Hennis was assigned to supply duties commensurate with his rank. There was "no need to lock him up," the spokesman said. After retiring from the military, Hennis had taken a white-collar job.

Hennis is accused of raping and killing Kathryn Eastburn, 31, and killing Erin Eastburn, 3, and Kara Eastburn, 5, on May 9, 1985. Stationed at Ft. Bragg at the time and the father of a baby girl, Hennis two days before the slayings had answered a newspaper advertisement to buy the Eastburns’ dog. He left the home with the family’s English setter, Dixie.

According to Hennis, Kathryn Eastburn explained that the family was moving to England and that she wanted to find Dixie a good home because she feared the dog might not survive the trip. Hennis said he sat with Eastburn at the kitchen table and used the bathroom while he was there. He also said he exchanged phone numbers with Eastburn in case the dog didn’t work out.

The bodies were discovered three days later. A third daughter, a toddler, was found wailing in a crib. She was severely dehydrated but survived. Hennis and his wife went to the authorities after learning on TV that they wanted to interview the man who had adopted the Eastburn dog. Hennis gave biological samples and was released.

Hennis eventually was arrested and convicted, based largely on an eyewitness who said he saw him outside the Eastburn home on the night of the killings.

Fingerprints, an unidentified pubic hair in the living room, unidentified hairs in the sheets and other physical evidence from the crime scene did not implicate Hennis. A test on the semen during the first trial also did not point to Hennis, although full-blown DNA analysis was not yet in use.

It’s 45 Days in the Slammer for Paris Hilton

Paris Hilton, her long blond hair tied back in a ponytail and oversized sunglasses shading her eyes, pulled up to L.A. traffic court near downtown Friday more than 15 minutes late for her probation violation hearing.

It was perhaps a moment when being prompt would have proved more fashionable.

Two hours later, Hilton departed with a 45-day jail sentence and a verbal comeuppance from the judge, who told her the time had come to take responsibility for her own actions. She has until June 5 to report to Century Regional Detention Center in Lynwood to serve her time or risk a total of 90 days behind bars.

On the stand, the socialite blamed her handlers for her being caught behind the wheel twice while her driver’s license was suspended for a drunk-driving conviction.

Asked whether she had understood the terms of the drunk-driving plea that she agreed to Jan. 22, Hilton, 26, said: "I just sign what people tell me to sign…. I’m a very busy person."

The Judge made it clear that he wanted no special treatment for Hilton — an heiress to the Hilton hotel fortune and a successful entrepreneur in her own right — ordering her to spend her sentence in a county jail and not a privately run "glamour slammer" where other celebrities have done their time.

Hilton, who made the sign of the cross in the moments before the judge gave his verdict, sobbed afterward.

Until late last year, overcrowded jail facilities in the county had led Sheriff Lee Baca to release most inmates early, including immediately processing out anyone sentenced to less than 90 days in jail. That is no longer true, and Hilton is likely to serve the full 45 days.

Hilton pleaded no contest to driving under the influence after she was pulled over in Hollywood Sept. 7 by LAPD officers for speeding and making an illegal left turn.

After she failed a field sobriety test, her blood alcohol level was measured at 0.08, just over the legal limit.

Within hours of her arrest, she dismissed the incident as "nothing" to radio host Ryan Seacrest, explaining: "I was just really hungry, and I wanted to have an In-N-Out burger."

As part of her plea, Hilton’s driving privileges were suspended from Nov. 30 to March 31.

Supreme Court Overturns 3 Death Sentences in Texas

 The Supreme Court overturned the death sentences of three Texas murderers Wednesday, ruling that jurors were not given a fair chance to spare them given their mental difficulties and histories of childhood abuse.

In a series of 5-4 votes, the court pointed to the flaws in the Texas capital sentencing system before 1991. The rulings will probably lead to new sentencing hearings for a handful of Texas death row inmates who were given death sentences under the old system.

Until Texas was forced to revise its law in 1991, jurors were given only two questions when deciding whether a convicted killer would receive a sentence of death or life in prison. Was the murder deliberate, and did the killer represent a "continuing threat" to society? If the jury agreed on a "yes" answer to both, the defendant received a death sentence.

In the late 1970s, however, the Supreme Court had said jurors must be permitted to weigh any "mitigating factor" in a defendant’s life or character as a reason to spare him from a death sentence. Nonetheless, the justices upheld the Texas system at the time, even though it left little or no room for jurors to weigh mitigating evidence.

For a time, Texas judges tried to get around the problem by telling jurors they could falsely answer "no" when they were asked whether the murderer presented a continuing threat to society, even though they thought the right answer to the question was yes.

Not surprisingly, the justices in the majority Wednesday described that approach as "fatally flawed" because it depended on jurors giving an answer they knew to be untrue.

Justices John Paul Stevens, Anthony M. Kennedy, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer formed the majority in all three decisions.

The rulings reversed death sentences for Ted Cole, now known as Jalil Abdul-Kabir, who strangled and robbed a 68-year-old man in San Angelo; Brent Brewer, who stabbed and robbed a 66-year-old store owner in Amarillo; and LaRoyce Smith, who stabbed and killed a former co-worker at a Taco Bell in Dallas.

In a strong dissent, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said the fault in the handling of the cases lay with the Supreme Court, not the state and federal judges in Texas.

"Our precedents did not provide them with ‘clearly established’ law, but instead a dog’s breakfast of divided, conflicting and ever-changing analyses," Roberts wrote.

He said the lower court judges were told to follow the law as it was then, but the majority at the Supreme Court shifted back and forth and failed "to follow a consistent path."

No wonder, he said, that the appellate judges in Texas were unsure whether they should affirm or reverse the Texas death sentences handed down before 1991.

Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. joined Roberts in dissent.

 

Ted Bills