Archive for the ‘Legal Fee Issues’


Lawyers Go on Strike

Lawyers in Italy have gone on strike to protest a proposed overhaul of legal fees.

Hundreds, if not thousands, of legal cases are being pushed back on court dockets, delayed well into the fall and winter because lawyers in Italy are refusing to participate in hearings and Italy’s judicial system, glacial in good times, has ground virtually to a halt.

The lawyers are protesting a series of changes proposed by the new center-left government of Prime Minister Romano Prodi. The reforms would allow lawyers to advertise and to change their fee structures so they could claim a percentage of settlements in civil cases. The law also would eliminate a fee minimum.

The Prodi government maintains that the changes would make the legal profession more competitive and conform it to standards prevalent in the European Union. The changes are part of a broader plan aimed at jump-starting the sluggish Italian economy by making various sectors more competitive.

Lawyers complain that only colleagues in big firms would benefit, while those in individual practices, the majority, would be driven out of the market. They want to keep the standardized schedule of fees.

The same proposed law aimed at spurring competition would deregulate the taxi industry and allow nonprescription drugs to be sold in supermarkets. As a consequence, cabdrivers have been staging periodic wildcat strikes, paralyzing Rome and other Italian cities, and pharmacists in white smocks shut their stores and started handing out protest leaflets.

Separately, flight attendants with the national airline, Alitalia, and air traffic controllers are expected to go on strike next week.

Even without a strike, justice in Italy is slow: A civil trial takes eight years on average, a criminal case five. As of June 30, 2004, about 9 million cases awaited sentencing, and 100,000 others were before the Supreme Court, according to the most recent official statistics available.

About The Author:
Attorney Edward A. ("Ted") Bills can be reached at 719.444.1000 or at http://www.SpringsAttorney.com.

Attorney Ted Bills has one mission – to fight for the rights of personal injury victims and those who have been devastated by the misconduct of others – he represents clients with an aggressive approach designed to provide SWIFT justice.

Attorney Bills is a member of the American Bar Association, the Colorado Bar Association, the Colorado Trial Lawyers Association, the Association of Trial Lawyers of America, and the El Paso County (Colorado Springs) Bar Association. He works in tandem with his clients to provide assertive, business-savvy, legal services that solve problems, reduce delays, and minimize costs.

Nothing on this site constitutes an attorney-client relationship nor does it constitute legal advice.


Lawyer wins $11 million from Allstate


Allstate Insurance Company rountinely contracted with Attorney Suzanne Guest to represent the company against accident claims – nothing unusual there. As part of the the agreement, Allstate also contracted to defend the attorney against actions filed against the attorney by Allstate customers – again nothing unusual there.

But when two accident victims sued both Allstate and the attorney, Allstate decided to not provide representation to Guest – big mistake and Guest sued Allstate.

A district court jury in New Mexico awarded the attorney nearly $11 million on her claim that Allstate had ruined her legal practice.

It seems that when Allstate refused to defend Guest and Guest decided to sue Allstate, she had to give up all ther Allstate cases because there was a confilct of interest. And, apparently, her entire practice was composed of representing Allstate.

The jury deliberated for only about five hours before coming to a verdict and Guest was awarded $1.8 million in compensatory damages and $9 million in punitive damages.

Allstate will likely appeal and try to get the verdict overturned.

About The Author:
Attorney Edward A. ("Ted") Bills can be reached at 719.444.1000 or at http://www.SpringsAttorney.com.

Attorney Ted Bills has one mission – to fight for the rights of personal injury victims and those who have been devastated by the misconduct of others – he represents clients with an aggressive approach designed to provide SWIFT justice.

Attorney Bills is a member of the American Bar Association, the Colorado Bar Association, the Colorado Trial Lawyers Association, and the El Paso County (Colorado Springs) Bar Association. He works in tandem with his clients to provide assertive, business-savvy, legal services that solve problems, reduce delays, and minimize costs.

Nothing on this site constitutes an attorney-client relationship nor does it constitute legal advice.

 

All you need to know about Personal Injury Law


Personal Injury law comes under the umbrella of law of torts in the US. The name tort is derived from the French word tort, which means wrong. Personal Injury is also a term applied to any damage or harm done to a person’s body, reputation, rights, or property.

Personal Injury claims can be filed under both civil and criminal law suits depending upon the details of the case.

Personal Injury includes, dog bites, motor accidents, wrongful death, product liability, medical malpractice, sexual harassment, emotional duress, bodily harm, damage to reputation, nuisance etc. The person suffering the personal injury may be able to recover damages from the person/company causing the injury.

Damages are financial compensation for loss of income, disability, loss of love and affection, emotional distress, pain etc.

The law of torts is divided into 4 categories: intentional torts, negligence, strict liability and nuisance.

  1. Intentional torts are those torts that are committed by a wrong doer purposely. For example: battery, assault, false imprisonment, defamation, trespassing, invasion of privacy, causing emotional distress, racial or sexual discrimination, and etc.

  1. Negligence torts are those wrongs, which are done unintentionally. They are the most common of the tort cases in court. They include product liability (products that are dangerous to the users even when used correctly), medical malpractice, misdiagnosis, and etc.

  1. Strict liability torts are those wrongs, which are borne out of occupational hazards and use of dangerous products. They need not be due to negligence of the defendant. Occupational hazards like construction workers, factory workers, and etc. Anywhere it is the duty of the employer to provide a safe working atmosphere.

  1. Nuisance torts are those wrongs which interfere with an individual’s use of his land or property. For instance noise pollution by a factory, smoking by individuals in public places, and etc.

If you are injured, contact a personal injury lawyer to check the merits of the case, to see if a case exists, the amount of potential damages, and etc.

Most law firms take personal injury cases on contingency basis, meaning that the lawyer gets paid from the claim on winning the case.

About The Author:
Attorney Edward A. ("Ted") Bills can be reached at 719.444.1000 or at http://www.SpringsAttorney.com.

Attorney Ted Bills has one mission – to fight for the rights of personal injury victims and those who have been devastated by the misconduct of others – he represents clients with an aggressive approach designed to provide SWIFT justice.

Attorney Bills is a member of the American Bar Association, the Colorado Bar Association, the Colorado Trial Lawyers Association, and the El Paso County (Colorado Springs) Bar Association. He works in tandem with his clients to provide assertive, business-savvy, legal services that solve problems, reduce delays, and minimize costs.

Nothing on this site constitutes an attorney-client relationship nor does it constitute legal advice.

Expert Witnesses

This post is from Attorney Edward A. (“Ted”) Bills who can be reached at  719.444.1000  or at   http://www.SpringsAttorney.com.

Anything provided on this blog is for informational purposes only and by no means constitutes an attorney-client relationship between a visitor and Attorney Ted Bills.  Any reader of this blog is urged to consult competent legal counsel regarding specific points of law and not construe any material transmitted via this blog as legal advice.

Expert Witnesses:

During the O.J. Simpson murder trial (where O.J. was acquitted on the criminal charges) and the subsequent civil trial (where O.J. was found responsible for the victims’ “wrongful death”) the public was introduced to something that lawyers and other legal professionals know very well – expert witnesses and expert consultants. These professionals often play important and sometimes critical roles in litigation. The more important or complex the matter, the more likely you are to see experts involved for each side.

Who can be an expert?

Anyone with special knowledge, skill, experience, training and/or education beyond the experience of ordinary members of the public can offer services as an expert. It is up to the court to accept someone as an expert if that person is providing testimony in a capacity as an expert. 

In the Simpson cases these experts ranged from DNA experts, knife experts, crime scene investigators, forensic pathologists, glove manufacturers (if the glove doesn’t fit, you must acquit) and even experts in police practices.

The role these experts play will vary from case to case. There are times when an expert will simply serve as a consultant to the lawyer and be known only to the lawyer while, at other times, the expert will be used only at the pre-trial stage, perhaps to provide a supporting affidavit regarding a single element of the case. Finally, in some cases the expert may serve as a witness at trial or serve various combination roles.

How much is an expert paid?

The simple answer is “It depends.”

Experts are not paid for their testimony but are paid for their time and at rates comparable to their normal fees from other assignments.

Most experts charge a minimum fee (and these minimum fees can be very expensive). Some experts refuse to accept minor matters that generate little income.

Time billed by an expert can include time on the witness stand, time spent studying files, reviewing evidence, and writing reports, time spent meeting with lawyers or the client, time spent at the courthouse, time on the witness stand, and even time spent traveling.

Time on the witness stand is typically only a very small portion of time an expert will spend on a matter.

Attorney Ted Bills has one mission – to fight for the rights of personal injury victims and those who have been devastated by the misconduct of others – he represents clients which an aggressive approach designed to provide SWIFT justice. Attorney Bills is a member of the American Bar Association, the Colorado Bar Association, the Colorado Trial Lawyers Association, and the El Paso County (Colorado Springs) Bar Association. He works in tandem with his clients to provide assertive, business-savvy, legal services that solve problems, reduce delays, and minimize costs.

Statutes of limitation

This post is from Attorney Edward A. (“Ted”) Bills who can be reached at  719.444.1000 or at  http://www.SpringsAttorney.com.

Anything provided on this blog is for informational purposes only and by no means constitutes an attorney-client relationship between a visitor and Attorney Bills. Any reader of this blog is urged to consult competent legal counsel regarding specific points of law and not construe any material transmitted via this blog as legal advice.

Statutes of limitation: 

In law there is a provision called the “statute of limitation” and that legal provision can limit the time period in which a person can file a lawsuit.

If you feel you have a claim in Colorado for personal injury, medical malpractice, or wrongful death, contact a Colorado Personal Injury Attorney immediately regardless of whether or not the statute of limitation has passed.

While the URL listed below can provide some reference to statutes that have been operational in the state of Colorado – there is no assurance that this data is either current or complete so, again, you should contact a Colorado Personal Injury Attorney.

Colorado Statutes of Limitation: http://198.187.128.12/colorado/lpext.dll?f=templates&fn=fs-main.htm&2.0

Attorney Ted Bills has one mission – to fight for the rights of personal injury victims and those who have been devastated by the misconduct of others – he represents clients with an aggressive approach designed to provide SWIFT justice. Attorney Bills is a member of the American Bar Association, the Colorado Bar Association, the Colorado Trial Lawyers Association, and the El Paso County Bar Association. He works in tandem with his clients to provide assertive, business-savvy, legal services that solve problems, reduce delays, and minimize costs.

 

 

An Overview of Personal Injury Issues -

This post is from Attorney Edward A. (“Ted”) Bills who can be reached at 719.444.1000 or at http://www.SpringsAttorney.com.

When you suffer a personal injury, you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries. Legal responsibility, called “liability,” revolves around the fact that most injuries happen because someone was careless or “negligent.” Even if you were partly responsible for your own injury, it is still possible to get some compensation if someone else was also careless and partly responsible for your injury.

Common injuries in personal injury cases include head injuries, brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, burn injuries, broken bones, fractures, knee injuries, neck injuries, back injuries, shoulder injuries, muscle and ligament injuries, herniated or bulging disks, reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), paralysis, paraplegia, and quadriplegia. Personal injury law areas of practice generally include motor vehicle accidents, auto accidents, motorcycle crashes, semi-truck collisions, 18-wheeler wrecks, SUV rollover accidents, drunk driving accidents, slip, trip and fall injuries, premises liability claims, construction site accidents, job-related accidents, industrial accidents, dangerous and defective products, as well as dog bites and animal attacks.

When you’re injured, you need all the help you can get, and you need it as soon as possible. Still, it’s important to pick an attorney who will care more about your well-being than in getting a quick, but low, settlement – someone that will understand that it is not just you who has issues, but your spouse, your children, and other family members.

Many personal injury lawyers provide initial consultations free of charge. Through such a process you can interview the lawyer before making a decision. What is important is how comfortable you are with the lawyer you select. Care should be taken, however, to make your selection in a relatively short period of time since the law provides strict limits and specific time period in which suit may be brought. Once engaged, an attorney should be responsive to your needs; answer questions satisfactorily, return telephone calls promptly, have an experienced administrative staff and, most importantly, represent your interests zealously. If at any time you are dissatisfied with your lawyer, you should be able to change attorneys without penalty.

While most personal injury claims are settled out of court, knowing that an attorney is both willing and able to try a case in court, if that becomes necessary, should add an additional dimension to your overall sense of security. Then if the case does fail to settle, strong and shrewd litigation skills can almost certainly precipitate a better outcome.

So what does it cost?

Most personal injury lawyers work on a contingent-fee basis, which means that you pay nothing unless the attorney wins the case or secures a settlement acceptable to you. Typical contingent fees range from thirty to forty percent of the amount of damages recovered. While it may be tempting to choose a lawyer based solely on who will take the lowest percentage, fees alone should not be the determining factor since it is often the most experienced lawyer that will ask for, deserve and earn, the higher fees.

All legal cases have associated costs and such costs need to be paid. In personal injury cases, costs are generally paid first from the settlement funds, but it there is no settlement, costs are paid by the client. Costs include such items as filing fees, expert testimony fees, deposition fees, arbitration fees, legal research fees, postage, administrative and other related costs.

 

So who is really to blame for high insurance costs?

This blog is provided by http://www.SpringsAttorney.com the moderator is Attorney Edward A. (”Ted”) Bills, a personal/bodily injury attorney with offices in Colorado Springs, CO 80906. If you would like to talk with Attorney Bills, please call 719.444.1000 

In my personal and professional opinion it is the insurance companies – not personal injury lawyers – who are gouging doctors and the public.

Anyone with a television set has seen the airwaves flooded with commercials about how doctors are being driven away by lawyers and personal injury malpractice lawsuits. TV stations show doctors actually picketing and blaming trial lawyers for the skyrocketing premiums they have to pay. Doctors threaten to quit the practice of medicine and to move to other states with lower insurance premiums.

This is a story as familiar as it is misleading. When I reviewed statements filed by medical malpractice insurers in the Washington, DC area they show that lawsuits are actually going down, claims are going down, but rates are still going up.

It is hard to understand how attacking personal injury lawyers, taking away injured patients legal rights, imposing “caps” on jury awards, or any of the other things that have been advanced as “explanations” for this will help the situation.

The statistics in DC mirror what is occurring around the nation. An analysis of a national study of the 15 leading malpractice insurer carriers showed that premiums doubled – doubled! – yet paid claims remained flat since 2000.

In a recent issue of the Washington Monthly, Stephanie Mencimer debunked the myth of the so-called Personal injury “lawsuit crisis” and disclosed how the media played along. With anti-trial lawyer rhetoric reaching a fever pitch, this important article rebuts the lies that are being told about personal injury lawyers, so-called ‘frivolous lawsuits’ and the fictitious notion of a ‘lawsuit crisis’ in this country.
In her article, Ms. Mencimer noted “Last December, Newsweek featured a cover package by Stuart Taylor and Evan Thomas that blared: “Lawsuit Hell: Doctors, Teachers, Coaches, [and] Ministers. They all share a common fear: being sued on the job.” Paired with a weeklong tie-in on NBC News and online chats on MSNBC.com, the article [in Newsweek] claimed that because “Americans will sue each other at the slightest provocation,” the country is suffering from an “onslaught of litigation” that costs Americans $200 billion a year. The story was full of tales claiming to illustrate Americans’ overarching sense of legal entitlement and desire to “win a jackpot from a system that allows sympathetic juries to award plaintiffs not just real damages” but millions more for the impossible-to-measure ‘pain and suffering’ and highly arbitrary ‘punitive damages.’

“Among others, the story featured a softball tournament organizer, a minister, and a doctor who all claimed to have modified their behavior because they were terrified of lawsuits. Ryan Warner, an insurance salesman in Page, Ariz., told Newsweek that he had recently cancelled an annual charity softball tournament because an injured player had sued the city of Page for $100,000. Warner said that he worried he might be added as a defendant.

“The story as published, though, lacks a few critical details. Newsweek didn’t mention, for instance, that the 1997 federal Volunteer Protection Act ensures that people like Warner are immunized from these types of lawsuits. The article also excluded the injured man, Richard Sawyer, a locomotive engineer who suffered a dislocated ankle and a spiral fracture to the fibula–and missed months of work as a result–after he slid into a base that was supposed to break away on impact but didn’t because the city hadn’t followed the manufacturer’s instructions for maintaining these fixtures properly, according to Kevin Garrison, Sawyer’s lawyer.

“The event organizers had insurance–required by the city–to protect against exactly this kind of situation, but Warner cancelled the tournament anyway because he says the lawsuit was “a hassle.” Canceling the tournament proved a smart PR move, as it brought out an immense amount of pressure on Sawyer to drop his suit, says Garrison. The case was settled this January for an undisclosed amount and Warner was never named. In fact, the tournament has been revived and scheduled for early September.

“Not only were the particulars of the Newsweek story misleading. The essence of the story was wrong, too. Newsweek’s “onslaught” of lawsuits simply hasn’t happened. According to the National Center for State Courts, a research group funded by state courts, personal injury and other tort filings, when controlled for population growth, have declined nationally by 8 percent since the 1975, and have been falling steadily in real numbers since 1996. The numbers are even more dramatic in places with rapid population growth, like Texas, where the rate of tort filings fell 37 percent between 1990 and 2000. Even in liberal California, the rate of filings has plummeted 45 percent over the past decade. And those overly sympathetic juries Newsweek derides as so eager to dole out big bucks to injured victims?

In 2001, they voted against plaintiffs in 75 percent of all medical malpractice trials, according to the federal government’s Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS).

In an interview, Taylor dismisses these numbers as insignificant compared with the tort system’s $200 billion drag on the economy. “The costs of the tort system to society have gone up astronomically,” he says. That figure, though, comes from the insurance-industry consulting firm Tillinghast-Towers Perrin (TTP), which includes in its definition of the “tort system” insurance company administrative costs and overhead and the salaries of highly paid insurance company CEOs (Maurice “Hank” Greenberg, chairman of AIG, one of the world’s largest insurance companies, makes $29 million a year). One thing TTP doesn’t include: court budgets, which makes its study seem a lot more like an assessment of the insurance industry than of the legal system.

It’s not as though Newsweek wasn’t aware of these facts. On Friday, Dec. 5, a day before the story went to press, Taylor contacted the Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA) for a quote. ATLA relayed the request to the nonprofit Center for Justice and Democracy (CJD), whose director, Joanne Doroshow, emailed Taylor information that contradicted some of the assertions in the story, including the state court data and a critique of the TTP study. (Doroshow provided the entire email exchange to The Washington Monthly.) Taylor dismissed it all, telling Doroshow, “Based on your many emails to me over the past 24 hours, you have very little thoughtful analysis to contribute to that debate.”

Taylor did, however, take lots of his information from Philip K. Howard, the founder of Common Good, a group funded by corporations and physicians seeking to limit their legal liability for wrongdoing. Common Good’s agenda includes advocating for legislation that would end the civil jury’s role in many lawsuits. To advance the cause, Common Good helps reporters generate anti-lawsuit articles by distributing colorful litigation horror stories from around the country–the story from the Arizona Sun about Warner’s softball tournament, for instance, was linked on Common Good’s Web site a few months before the Newsweek story appeared.

Incidentally, Howard also works for the law firm of Covington & Burling, which represents Newsweek’s parent company. Post-Newsweek Inc. has been sued a number of times for employment discrimination and was hit with an $8.3 million verdict in 1999, a fact that Newsweek didn’t mention in the story.”

 

Lawyer Advertising

This blog is provided by http://www.SpringsAttorney.com the moderator is Attorney Edward A. (“Ted”) Bills, a personal/bodily injury attorney with offices in Colorado Springs, CO 80906. If you would like to talk with Attorney Bills, please call 719.444.1000.  

There is a recent Colorado Supreme Court decision, Crowe v. Tull, 126 P.3d 196 (Col. 2006), where the Court held that Colorado’s Consumer Protection Act applies to lawyer advertising. The case is summarized as follows: 

“Plaintiff Richard Crowe filed an action under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act (CCPA) against his former attorneys, Mar Tull and the firm of Azar & Associates, who settled his car accident personal injury claim.

He alleged that the attorneys had fraudulently claimed through a statewide program of television advertisements that the firm was highly skilled at negotiating with insurance companies and that the firm would obtain full value for its clients’ injuries.

According to the Colorado Supreme Court, the ads claimed that the lawyers “will always ‘obtain as much as we can, as fast as we can’” while another ad portrayed the firm’s presidnet as the strong arm who musceles infurance adjusters into paying up.

Crowe alleged that he had retained these lawyers on the basis of their ads but that he was ultimately pressured into settling his $17,000 medical specials and $8,000 wage loss claim for only $4,000 due to the defendants ineptitute. “The Trial court held that Crowe’s CCPA claim duplicated his legal malpractice claim and that the practice of law as not a commercial activity governed by the CCPA. On appeal, the Colorado Supreme Court reinstated the CCPA claim.

“The  Colorado Supreme Court held that the CCPA was intended to apply to all deceptive marketing practices and fraudulent advertising without regard to the defendant’s occupation. It declined to adopt the decision of the Washington Supreme Court to the effect that the comparable Washington statute could only apply to the so-called entrepreneurial aspects of legal practice. The Colorado Supreme Court held that the CCPA does not create liability for those who intend to live up to the pronouncements of their advertisement, but innocently or negligently fail to conform their conduct to their words. The court stated that on the record before it “there was sufficient evidence from which a fact finder could conclude that the defendant knowingly engaged in deceptice trade practices.”

Edward Bills, “The Lawyer Who Cares” 

Fee Arrangement Alternatives

This blog is provided by http://www.SpringsAttorney.com the moderator is Attorney Edward A. (“Ted”) Bills, a personal/bodily injury attorney with offices in Colorado Springs, CO 80906. If you would like to talk with Attorney Bills, please call 719.444.1000.  

Attorney Edward (”Ted”) Bills, like many attorneys, offers a variety of fee arrangements and it is always wise to discuss fee alternatives with an attorney before you hire him or her as your counsel.  Generally the type of fee arrangement is dependent upon  the type of case. 

Most of the alternative fee arrangements generally require the client to advance or pay for related case costs. Just like you would want an estimate from your auto mechanic for repairs, you should ask for and receive at least a range of what it is going to cost for your legal services and some reasonable definition of the scope of the assignment – so that you are not overwhelmed when the bill comes or surprised when something comes up that is “outside of the scope.” Nobody likes surprises. 

Here is a list of some of the more common types of Fee Arrangements offered by Attorneys:  Flat Fee – when you need to know exactly what it is going to cost you to have an attorney represent you in a matter. 

  • This method is generally used for traffic violation cases or other cases where there is a single service to be performed by the Attorney. 

  • You always know exactly what it is going to cost for your professional services. 

 Contingency Fee – 100% of the Attorney’s Fee is based on a successful outcome of the matter. 

  • This method is generally used for Personal Injury, Bodily Injury, Worker’ Compensation, Slip and Fall, and similar legal matters. 

  • There are certain cases where a Contingency Fee is not permitted by ethics rules so please discuss this with the attorneys you interview. 

Blended Fee – a combination of a Flat Fee (for certain deliverables) and a Contingency Fee (based on a successful outcome).  Budget Fee – where you need to budget your costs over a period of time. 

  • This method is generally used in Criminal, Family Law (Divorce) matters 

  • Often there are provision if the budget is exceeded. 

Hourly Fee – where you are charged for the time spent on you case by the attorney and support staff. 

  • This is the most common Fee Arrangement used by Attorneys. 

  • You need to trust your Attorney to bill you for only the exact time spent on your matter (often calculated in 1/10th hour increments). 

  • The bill rate for Attorney Edward (“Ted”) Bills is currently $175 per hour with his administrative staff billing at the rate of $75 per hour. 

Pro Bono – where the Attorney works without charge to the client. 

  • Occasionally Attorneys will take a case without charge to the client. 

  • Every Attorney is expected to accept some Pro Bono work from time to time. 

  • Even in Pro Bono cases, Attorneys generally charge the client for expenses paid by the Attorney on behalf of the client.
       

   Edward Bills, “The Attorney Who Cares” 
 

 

 

Ted Bills