Archive for the ‘Legal Rulings’
Published
August 19th, 2010
in
Accidents with injuries, Automobile Accidents, Briefs, Legal Rulings, Of General Interest, Recent Rulings |
No Comments »
A Florida court of appeals has upheld a $65 million verdict in a lawsuit over a 2007 crash that left a young woman seriously injured. The woman was hit by a tractor trailer that ran a red light, suffering such extensive injuries that she cannot care for herself. The company that owns of the tractor trailer that hit the woman, asked for the damages to be reduced, but the appeals court sided with the lower court’s decision.
Published
July 29th, 2010
in
Automobile Accidents, Briefs, Case Settlements, Legal Rulings, Misconduct, Of General Interest, Wrongful Death |
No Comments »
A sports bar in Austell, Ga., has agreed to pay $1 million to the widow of a man killed by a drunk driver who was allegedly over-served by the bar staff. The lawsuit claims that in October 2008, The Sports Grill served alcohol to a man when he was already drunk. The man then crashed his car into another vehicle, killing the car’s owner. The judge also sanctioned the bar after it was discovered that they destroyed video tapes and bar tabs that showed the man drinking.
Published
May 4th, 2010
in
Briefs, Legal Rulings, Of General Interest, Wrongful Death |
No Comments »
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled Monday that the family of a Los Angeles-area immigrant who died of cancer that wasn’t treated while he was federal detention cannot pursue damages against government doctors for medical negligence. Over an 11-month period in 2006, correctional facility doctors refused to perform a biopsy of a growing lesion on Francisco Castaneda’s penis despite outside doctors’ recommendations. Castaneda was released in January 2007 and received treatment, but it was too late; he died a year later of cancer. Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in her ruling that a damage suit against the government itself is the “exclusive” remedy for victims of medical errors or negligence.
Published
April 29th, 2010
in
Briefs, Legal Rulings, Medical Malpractice, Misconduct, Of General Interest |
No Comments »
A U.S. District Judge in Texas ruled that a lawsuit over alleged “fight clubs” in a Corpus Christi facility for people with mental disabilities can proceed. Judge Janis Graham Jack dismissed the request from the four state officials named as defendants that they be excluded from the lawsuit because of qualified immunity. The lawsuit, which represents five plaintiffs, claims that the officials should have been aware of the incidents that occurred in 2008 and 2009 and that more security was necessary to keep the residents safe. In 2007, there were 1,013 allegations of abuse, neglect or exploitation — and 51 confirmed cases — at the 430-bed facility, the Austin American-Statesman reports.
Published
April 22nd, 2010
in
Bodily Injuries, Briefs, Legal Rulings, Medical Malpractice, Misconduct, Of General Interest |
No Comments »
A New York judge has awarded $2.2 million to a quadriplegic former construction worker who developed severe bedsores while recovering from a spinal cord injury. According to an attorney for the plaintiff, staff at the Westchester Medical Center failed to regularly turn the patient during his stay at the hospital. The bedsores had to be surgically closed and prevented the patient from participating in physical therapy, his attorney said.
Published
April 20th, 2010
in
Briefs, Legal Rulings, Of General Interest, Wrongful Death |
No Comments »
A federal judge in Los Angeles recently dismissed without prejudice an eight-year-long wrongful death lawsuit filed against the city over the fatal shooting of former rapper Christopher Wallace, also known as the Notorious B.I.G. In the lawsuit, Wallace’s mother accused the Los Angeles police department of conspiracy and attempting to cover up their involvement in her son’s shooting. In 2005, another judge ordered the city to pay the family $1.1 million in legal fees and ruled that the police had intentionally withheld evidence. Lawyers for Wallace say they will refile the lawsuit.
Published
April 16th, 2010
in
Accidents with injuries, Automobile Accidents, Bodily Injuries, Briefs, Legal Rulings, Of General Interest, Wrongful Death, Your Government at Work for You |
No Comments »
A Mississippi judge has approved a lawsuit filed by a woman who claims she was severely injured when the car she was riding in was hit by a police officer who ran a red light without his lights on siren on. The city of Jackson, Miss., attempted to have the lawsuit thrown out, claiming that Joi Fitzgerald did not prove that the officer acted with “reckless disregard,” but the judge dismissed the motion. In a similar case in 2005, a judge ruled against a then-Jackson police officer when he ran a red light and caused a fatal accident.
Published
April 6th, 2010
in
Briefs, Legal Rulings, Misconduct, Of General Interest, Only in California! |
No Comments »
The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that will allow a former California resident to file a lawsuit against the city of San Carlos and two police officers. According to the lawsuit, the officers wrongly broke into the home of Bruce Hopkins and arrested him after he was involved a fender-bender in August 2003. The officers claimed they suspected Hopkins was intoxicated at the time of the crash. However, all charges were eventually dropped. A trial in the case is expected to be scheduled sometime in the next few months.
Published
April 1st, 2010
in
Briefs, Legal Rulings, Misconduct, Of General Interest |
No Comments »
The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that a home healthcare company had no right to access e-mails sent from former employer to her attorney. In a unanimous ruling, the high court upheld an appellate decision that the Loving Care Agency had no need to read communications sent on company laptop from a password-protected Yahoo e-mail account. The case is Stengart v. Loving Care Agency.
Published
March 31st, 2010
in
Briefs, Legal Rulings, Of General Interest, Whistleblower Issues |
No Comments »
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled 7-2 to further restrict the grounds on which whistle-blower lawsuits can be brought on behalf of the U.S. government. The ruling revolved around a portion of the False Claims Act, which allows ordinary citizens to help the government uncover and fight fraudulent contracts. One portion of the law prohibits whistle-blower suits brought on by information already public “in a congressional, administrative or Government Accounting Office report, hearing, audit or investigation.” The Department of Justice argued that that stipulation only covered federal reports, not reports at the state or local level, but the Supreme Court disagreed. The majority justices ruled that “administrative” reports covered state and local audits as well as federal audits