<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bodily Injury Blog &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com</link>
	<description>By Colorado Personal Injury Attorney Ted Bills</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Information Act Suit Filed Seeking Bin Laden Pictures</title>
		<link>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/information-act-suit-filed-seeking-bin-laden-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/information-act-suit-filed-seeking-bin-laden-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 11:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Bills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Of General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Government at Work for You]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/?p=4343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The public interest group Judicial Watch has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense seeking the release of images and videos surrounding the death of Osama bin Laden. The interest group stated that the &#8220;American people have a right to know, by law, basic information about the killing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<div>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" bgcolor="#ffffdd">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="600" bgcolor="#ffffdd">
<tbody></tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">The public interest group Judicial Watch has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense seeking the release of images and videos surrounding the death of Osama bin Laden. The interest group stated that the &#8220;American people have a right to know, by law, basic information about the killing of Osama bin Laden.&#8221; Under the FOIA, the government has 20 days to respond to the request, but the Defense Department instead issued a statement, saying, &#8220;At this time, we are unable to make a release determination on your request within the 20-day statutory time period.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/information-act-suit-filed-seeking-bin-laden-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suit: Pennsylvania Must Keep Income Program Alive</title>
		<link>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/suit-pennsylvania-must-keep-income-program-alive/</link>
		<comments>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/suit-pennsylvania-must-keep-income-program-alive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Bills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Of General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Government at Work for You]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/?p=4052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And now it begins. A lawsuit has been filed against the state of Pennsylvania to force the state to continue paying health-care coverage for 42,000 low-income adults whose insurance program ended last month. The suit claims the state has no right to end the decade-long program because &#8220;its funding from the state is stipulated by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 14.0px; font: 12.0px Verdana; color: #062499} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 14.0px Verdana; min-height: 17.0px} p.p3 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 12.0px; font: 11.0px Verdana} td.td1 {width: 450.0px} --></p>
<p style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">And now it begins.</p>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle">
<p style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">A lawsuit has been filed against the state of Pennsylvania to force the state to continue paying health-care coverage for 42,000 low-income adults whose insurance program ended last month. The suit claims the state has no right to end the decade-long program because &#8220;its funding from the state is stipulated by state law.&#8221; The suit is seeking class-action status.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/suit-pennsylvania-must-keep-income-program-alive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red-Light Cameras Unconstitutional, Suit Says</title>
		<link>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/red-light-cameras-unconstitutional-suit-says/</link>
		<comments>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/red-light-cameras-unconstitutional-suit-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Bills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Of General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent case filings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/?p=3144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lawsuit has been filed in Florida challenging a new state law that allows cities to install red-light cameras to give tickets to motorists that run red lights. The lawsuit claims the camera takes away people&#8217;s basic right to &#8220;innocence until proven guilty.&#8221; The lawsuit claims that, under the law, car owners have to prove [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<p>A lawsuit has been filed in Florida challenging a new state law that allows cities to install red-light cameras to give tickets to motorists that run red lights. The lawsuit claims the camera takes away people&#8217;s basic right to &#8220;innocence until proven guilty.&#8221; The lawsuit claims that, under the law, car owners have to prove they were not driving the vehicle to avoid a ticket violation, when the burden of proof should fall on the city. The lawsuit seeks to invalidate the red-light camera program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/red-light-cameras-unconstitutional-suit-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Medical Examiner to File Whistleblower Suit</title>
		<link>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/former-medical-examiner-to-file-whistleblower-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/former-medical-examiner-to-file-whistleblower-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Bills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Of General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/?p=2256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Oklahoma chief medical examiner says he plans to file a whistleblower lawsuit over claims he was fired from his job for reporting gross errors in the state grand jury investigation that brought criminal charges against the man he replaced nine months ago. Dr. Collie M. Trant said he was not made aware at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The former Oklahoma chief medical examiner says he plans to file a whistleblower lawsuit over claims he was fired from his job for reporting gross errors in the state grand jury investigation that brought criminal charges against the man he replaced nine months ago. Dr. Collie M. Trant said he was not made aware at all that his job was in jeopardy and wants his job and reputation back. According to the lawsuit, Trant said that the chief administrative officer for the medical examinerâ??s office, Tom Jordan, had &#8220;set me up to fail.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/former-medical-examiner-to-file-whistleblower-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/republicans-push-%e2%80%98loser-pays%e2%80%99-med-mal-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/republicans-push-%e2%80%98loser-pays%e2%80%99-med-mal-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Bills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Of General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/?p=1922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican lawmakers have proposed a bill that would force plaintiffs who lose medical malpractice lawsuits to pay legal costs for both sides. The bill, introduced by Sens. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina also calls for an arbitration provision for medical malpractice cases. Opponents of the measure have called it unnecessary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican lawmakers have proposed a bill that would force plaintiffs who lose medical malpractice lawsuits to pay legal costs for both sides. The bill, introduced by Sens. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina also calls for an arbitration provision for medical malpractice cases. Opponents of the measure have called it unnecessary and dangerous.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/republicans-push-%e2%80%98loser-pays%e2%80%99-med-mal-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: FDA Approved Device Under Political Pressure</title>
		<link>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/report-fda-approved-device-under-political-pressure/</link>
		<comments>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/report-fda-approved-device-under-political-pressure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Bills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bodily Injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Of General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Government at Work for You]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/?p=1686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Food and Drug Administration approved a controversial knee-surgery device after receiving pressure from lawmakers and lobbyists, the Washington Post reports. According to a report released last week by the FDA, regulators seem to have buckled under political pressure from four New Jersey lawmakers with financial ties to ReGen Biologics. The report noted that FDA [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Food and Drug Administration approved a controversial knee-surgery device after receiving pressure from lawmakers and lobbyists, the Washington Post reports. According to a report released last week by the FDA, regulators seem to have buckled under political pressure from four New Jersey lawmakers with financial ties to ReGen Biologics. The report noted that FDA staff had previously opposed approval of the device. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/report-fda-approved-device-under-political-pressure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Finds Smoking Bans Reduce Health Risks</title>
		<link>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/study-finds-smoking-bans-reduce-health-risks/</link>
		<comments>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/study-finds-smoking-bans-reduce-health-risks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Bills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Of General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/?p=1667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study published in the journal Circulation reveals an up to 36 percent reduction in heart attacks after smoking bans were enacted. Researchers studied the rate of heart attacks in US, Canadian and European cities immediately after smoking bans became effective and noted a 17 percent reduction the first year of the ban, followed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new study published in the journal Circulation reveals an up to 36 percent reduction in heart attacks after smoking bans were enacted. Researchers studied the rate of heart attacks in US, Canadian and European cities immediately after smoking bans became effective and noted a 17 percent reduction the first year of the ban, followed by the 36 percent reduction after three years. They used the data to call for increased bans on public smoking to reduce the affects of secondhand smoke which lead to heart attacks, and noted that the bans should result in reduced health care costs as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/study-finds-smoking-bans-reduce-health-risks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calif. Reforms Signed into Law</title>
		<link>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/calif-reforms-signed-into-law/</link>
		<comments>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/calif-reforms-signed-into-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Bills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bodily Injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Of General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Only in California!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/?p=1550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two personal injury bills were signed into law by California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. The first, known as the &#8220;Good Samaritan&#8221; bill, provides liability protection for those who stop and render aid at the scene of an accident, and was passed in response to the California Supreme Court’s earlier ruling that liability only extended to trained [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two personal injury bills were signed into law by California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. The first, known as the &#8220;Good Samaritan&#8221; bill, provides liability protection for those who stop and render aid at the scene of an accident, and was passed in response to the California Supreme Court’s earlier ruling that liability only extended to trained responders. Assembly Bill 470 also became law, allowing lawyers to receive their clients’ records directly from insurance companies, changing prior legislation that only permitted companies to provide records to the injured person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/calif-reforms-signed-into-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury Sides with Hospital in Patient Deportation Case</title>
		<link>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/jury-sides-with-hospital-in-patient-deportation-case/</link>
		<comments>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/jury-sides-with-hospital-in-patient-deportation-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Bills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Of General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Rulings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/?p=1413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A jury on Monday sided with a Florida hospital accused of wrongly repatriating a severely brain-injured illegal immigrant who had been a patient since 2000.&#160; In the verdict, jurors concluded that Martin Memorial Medical Center&#8217;s actions had not been unreasonable or unwarranted under the circumstances. In 2003, acting on an order from a state court [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A jury on Monday sided with a Florida hospital accused of wrongly repatriating a severely brain-injured illegal immigrant who had been a patient since 2000.&nbsp; In the verdict, jurors concluded that Martin Memorial Medical Center&rsquo;s actions had not been unreasonable or unwarranted under the circumstances. In 2003, acting on an order from a state court judge, and disregarding objections by a legal guardian, the hospital chartered a plane to return Luis Alberto Jim&eacute;nez to his native Guatamala. The lawsuit sought damages to cover Jim&eacute;nez&rsquo;s continued care in Guatamala.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/jury-sides-with-hospital-in-patient-deportation-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Treasury to Push Forward with New Consumer Agency</title>
		<link>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/treasury-to-push-forward-with-new-consumer-agency/</link>
		<comments>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/treasury-to-push-forward-with-new-consumer-agency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Bills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Of General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Government at Work for You]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/?p=1306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Treasury Department officials last week promised to push forward with plans to create a new consumer finance regulatory agency despite shouts from the financial services industry decrying the plan. Plans for the proposed agency were detailed in a draft bill sent to lawmakers last week. Consumer groups supporting the bill hope the new agency will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Treasury Department officials last week promised to push forward with plans to create a new consumer finance regulatory agency despite shouts from the financial services industry decrying the plan. Plans for the proposed agency were detailed in a draft bill sent to lawmakers last week. Consumer groups supporting the bill hope the new agency will serve as safety commission for financial products and help curb runaway lending the ended in the current wave of foreclosures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bodilyinjuryblog.com/treasury-to-push-forward-with-new-consumer-agency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

